grerp has an outstanding post titled More on Susan Walsh vs Friedman and Marcotte, where she describes the gradually changing landscape for women due to the sexual revolution:
In 1965 you could get a husband without sleeping with someone
In 1975 you could get a fiance without sleeping with someone
In 1985 you could get a boyfriend without sleeping with someone
In 1995 you could get a date without sleeping with someone
In 2010 you’re lucky to get a phone number if you don’t have sex first.
The irony of course is that feminists created this sort of inflation when they pushed for the sexual revolution. They saw women’s sexual power as a coin the patriarchy was preventing women from spending. Feminists took the tack of a young child: “I never get to have any fun!” As a result they inadvertently flooded the market, devaluing the coin of women’s sexual power.
A group of women in New York City who want to marry bankers has recognized the cost of this devaluation of women’s sexual power. Even though they have likely lived anything but a traditional life, they want a return to tradition when it comes to marrying rich men. As a result they repeat the old saying “why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free”. They yearn for a simpler time, when golddigging was easier. They explain in their post titled Sexual Revolution and Feminist: Wrong. Grandma: Right.
Just think about it. What if every single woman out there stopped having sex. No more one night stands. No more casual hook-ups. No more f*ck buddies. No more ex-sex. No more let’s start having sex and if it’s good then attempt to backtrack into a relationship. The boys of New York would have to start working for it!
Closing their legs until the cows come home.
They are proposing a sort of cartel, which allows women to collectively hold out for a better deal. This same model has worked quite well for OPEC, allowing oil producers to fetch a much higher price than they otherwise would receive. However cartels need moral or legal force to be effective. Otherwise everyone will encourage everyone else to hold out while they sell for whatever they can get. I’ll use the example of our golddigging friends in NYC to illustrate.
Lets say these women are serious, and decide to form a union (a form of cartel). They will need a suitably union sounding name if anyone is going to take them seriously. I propose: Women Holding Out for Relationship Equity. But there are other women having sex with bankers out there, so we need to identify them as well. These women aren’t in it for the money, but for the pure enjoyment of the sex and the ability to exercise their sexual power. Lets call them Sisters Lusting for Unlimited Titillation. To save space, I’ll refer to each group via their acronym in the rest of the post.
So lets say the WHOREs call a city wide sex strike. Do you think the SLUTs are going to take this lying down? Of course not! They’ll just enter into a backdoor agreement with the bankers and continue as usual. In addition, not all of the WHOREs will honor the strike. Some will claim they will honor the strike (lie) and then secretly cheat on the agreement. Thats right: lying cheating WHOREs. So if you are a banker, you have all of the SLUTS and lying cheating WHOREs you can handle. This naturally will bring the golddigging WHOREs to their knees.
What the golddigging WHOREs need is a method to enforce the strike. Labor unions use a combination of social pressure and legal protection to achieve this. However, the WHOREs are not in a good position to try to shame the SLUTs, so they probably won’t get enough social sympathy to enforce the strike or have the laws changed. After all, most of the WHOREs were in all likelyhood SLUTs until very recently, and as I mentioned earlier many of them are actually lying cheating WHOREs. More importantly, feminists have been very successful in creating an aversion to shaming SLUTs. Not too long ago shaming SLUTs was commonplace. But now as a blogger with a diverse audience I for example wouldn’t consider using slut shaming language, even to make a point. Many ordinary women have come to see an insult to sluts as an insult to all women.
It is important to note that not all women are golddiging WHOREs, lying cheating WHOREs, or SLUTs. There is another category which is often overlooked in the manosphere. These women understand that marriage is something much more than a vulgar economic transaction, and they take it very seriously. Unfortunately as we saw in the beginning of the post, these women can end up paying a price for the actions of the SLUTs and the WHOREs.
Cows pic from Wikipedia Commons.
Leave a Reply